Final answer:
Frege disagreed with David Hume, who held an empiricist and skeptical view that logical laws depend on human perception, while Frege believed that these laws are objective and not tied to human minds.
Step-by-step explanation:
Frege disagreed with David Hume, who believed that the laws of logic depend on the human mind. Hume, a philosophical skeptic, posited that all knowledge comes through the senses – a doctrine known as empiricism. He also argued that our senses do not necessarily provide proof of an external reality, which implies a dependence of logical laws on human perception and understanding.
In contrast, Gottlob Frege, a logician and mathematician, believed that the laws of logic were objective and not contingent upon human minds. Frege's work contributed significantly to the field of analytic philosophy, which seeks to understand the relations of words and what they denote. Frege's philosophy emphasized that the truths of mathematics and logic operate independently of sensory experience.