Final answer:
Actors such as richer countries and fossil fuel companies whose economic stability depends on the status quo are likely to resist cooperating on climate change as the value placed on the future increases. These actors have established structures that are heavily reliant on fossil fuels, and transitioning incurs short-term economic costs they are reluctant to bear.
Step-by-step explanation:
When considering which actors might stiffen their resistance to cooperation on climate change as the value placed on the future rises, one must look at the vested interests and potential costs to various stakeholders. Actors with the most to lose from transitioning away from fossil fuels and those whose short-term economic stability depends heavily on the status quo are likely to resist the most. This typically includes fossil fuel companies, certain governments, especially of richer countries, and industries that have high greenhouse gas emissions as a byproduct of their operations.
Richer countries might see their resistance to climate change cooperation stiffen considerably, as they have established economic structures heavily reliant on fossil fuels. Their resistance is fueled by the need to maintain economic growth, provide jobs, and remain competitive in a global market. Enhanced future valuation can ironically lead to increased short-term preservation strategies, focusing on maintaining the current economic benefits rather than incurring the costs associated with transitioning to sustainable practices
In contrast, poorer countries, despite aspiring for economic development, have historically contributed less to greenhouse gas emissions and may be more inclined to pursue sustainable development paths, especially if they integrate economic and environmental benefits in the long term. However, without support from developed nations and access to clean energy technologies, their efforts might not be sufficient. Additionally, internal politics, the power of influential lobbyists, and the challenge of achieving a global consensus further exacerbate the issue. Actors who prioritize immediate economic growth and have significant fossil fuel resources will particularly find it challenging to align with long-term climate goals.