Final answer:
The policies in the edit concerned both Christian missionary activities and trade, reflecting the complex interplay between religion and economic interests.
Step-by-step explanation:
The policies in the edit were primarily aimed at controlling Christian missionary activities for fear that it would create unrest and disrupt trade. These policies did not please the various stakeholders involved, and this led to an alliance between British Christians and Indian Muslims and Hindus. British Christians were against the ruling by the British East India Company due to its restriction on missionary work, while Indian Muslims and Hindus were opposed to the company's rule, desiring self-governance instead.
During the reign of Constantine, the Christian Church benefited from the Edict of Milan, which stopped the persecution of Christians and offered them legal rights and the return of confiscated property. However, these policies also had trade implications, as exemplified by various non-Muslim communities, including Jewish and Armenian Christian, who were significant traders and appreciated for their specialties in the trade network.
In summary, policies related to Christianity often had a dual impact on commerce due to the interconnectedness of social, religious, and economic interests in these historical contexts.