178k views
2 votes
Comparing unbuffered I/O to the use of a buffer in a program accessing a single I/O device, how μch can the use of a buffer reduce the running time?

a) At least a factor of two
b) Exactly a factor of two
c) More than a factor of two
d) No reduction in running time

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

The use of a buffer in a program accessing a single I/O device can reduce runtime significantly, potentially by more than a factor of two, as it allows for concurrent processing and reduces CPU idle times.

Step-by-step explanation:

When comparing unbuffered I/O with the use of a buffer in a program accessing a single I/O device, the use of a buffer can reduce the running time significantly, though the exact factor depends on the specific circumstances of the I/O operations and the system architecture. Buffers enable a program to run concurrently with some I/O operations, by storing or collecting data before the process actually requires it or sends it, thus reducing idle time waiting for these operations to complete.

The option that suggests a reduction by at least a factor of two is the minimum expectation because buffered I/O can smooth out the data transfer to and from the device, reducing the time the CPU spends waiting on I/O completion interrupts. However, in practice, the improvement in speed can be much greater than a factor of two, which corresponds to option (c): More than a factor of two.

User AlexPad
by
8.2k points