Final answer:
The claim that Harishena composed a prashasti in praise of Gautamiputra Sri Satakarni is false. Harishena was associated with the Gupta Empire while Gautamiputra Sri Satakarni was from the Satavahana dynasty.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'Harishena composed a prashasti in praise of Gautamiputra Sri Satakarni' is false. Harishena was a court poet of the Gupta Emperor Samudragupta and composed a prashasti, or panegyric, that is inscribed on the Allahabad Pillar, praising Samudragupta. The prashasti is known for providing details about Samudragupta's conquests and the extent of his empire. Gautamiputra Sri Satakarni, on the other hand, was a ruler of the Satavahana dynasty, which predates the Gupta Empire. His reign and commendation in literature, if any, would not be the work of Harishena, as they belonged to different time periods and dynasties.
The statement that "Harishena composed a prashasti in praise of Gautamiputra Sri Satakarni" is indeed false. Harishena was a renowned court poet during the Gupta period and composed a prashasti in praise of his patron, the Gupta Emperor Samudragupta. This panegyric is inscribed on the Allahabad Pillar and provides detailed information about Samudragupta's conquests and the expanse of his empire.Gautamiputra Sri Satakarni, on the other hand, was a ruler of the Satavahana dynasty, predating the Gupta Empire. Any commendation or literary work related to Gautamiputra Sri Satakarni would not be attributed to Harishena, as they lived in different historical periods and under distinct dynasties. This clarification underscores the importance of historical context when attributing literary or historical works to specific figures.