168k views
4 votes
Is it accurate to call the stories in the Bible "myths?" Are all the stories in the Bible considered historical? What is the basic difference when it comes the ordering of the books of the Jewish Bible (Tanak), the Catholic Old Testament and the Protestant Old Testament? Be sure to clearly answer all parts of this question thoroughly.

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

The stories in the Bible can be seen as both historical accounts and myths. The Jewish Bible, Catholic Old Testament, and Protestant Old Testament have different ordering of books.

Step-by-step explanation:

The stories in the Bible can be seen as both historical accounts and myths, depending on how they are interpreted. While some stories in the Bible have historical evidence to support them, others are mythological in nature and cannot be verified with empirical evidence. For example, the story of Moses can be compared to the rise of Sargon the Great in Mesopotamian tradition. Additionally, the story of the flood in the Bible is taken directly from the Mesopotamian Epic of Gilgamesh. However, the motivations behind these events differ between the Mesopotamian gods and the biblical Yahweh.



When it comes to the ordering of the books, the Jewish Bible, or Tanak, is ordered differently from the Catholic and Protestant Old Testaments. The Tanak is divided into three sections: the Torah (the Law), the Nevi'im (the Prophets), and the Ketuvim (the Writings). The Catholic Old Testament includes additional books known as the deuterocanonical books or the Apocrypha, which are not included in the Protestant Old Testament.

User Mocking
by
6.9k points