Final answer:
When revising an article for improved effectiveness, consider how the flow of ideas is affected by joining or rearranging paragraphs. Ensuring each section contributes to the overall message and provides clear transitions can significantly enhance readability. The ideal revision enhances the persuasiveness of arguments, clarity of the storyline, and accessibility of information.
Step-by-step explanation:
When considering which revision would improve the effectiveness of the article, it is essential to focus on the flow and coherence of ideas. To evaluate whether paragraphs should be joined or rearranged, examining the outline and the connections between paragraphs is necessary. The peer reviewer's comments suggest that transitions and the logical sequence of ideas are critical for the article's effectiveness.
For instance, if paragraphs A and B contain closely related ideas, joining them might create a more robust argument or narrative flow. Similarly, if paragraph B provides essential context or information that would be better suited after the details in paragraph C, then moving paragraph B after paragraph C could significantly enhance the reader's understanding. The introduction of new paragraphs should be considered only when the text reaches a point that warrants a distinct shift in topic or perspective. Thus, these revisory considerations require careful thought on how each part of the article supports its overall thesis and the author's intent.
Ultimately, the decision to revise the article should be guided by whether or not the revisions will make the argument more persuasive, the storyline clearer, or the information more accessible to the reader. Revising involves not just moving text around but ensuring that the content is well-organized and contributes meaningfully to the piece's main message. It is a balance of maintaining a natural reading rhythm while providing clear, effective communication of ideas.