59.2k views
5 votes
Based on the passage, how would the author most likely respond to another scientist’s claim that the theory of embodied cognition cannot account for thoughts regarding abstract concepts such as "peace" and "honesty"?

A)By arguing that the scientist has not fully considered the mechanics of the theory of embodied cognition
B)By asserting that thoughts about abstract concepts are less common than thoughts about concrete objects
C)By suggesting that the theory of embodied cognition should be tested under different experimental conditions
D)By conceding that the theory of embodied cognition may not account for all aspects of thought

User Kpp
by
7.4k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

The author would likely argue that the scientist has not fully considered the mechanics of embodied cognition about abstract concepts.

Step-by-step explanation:

Based on the passage, the author would most likely respond to another scientist’s claim that the theory of embodied cognition cannot account for thoughts regarding abstract concepts such as "peace" and "honesty" by arguing that the scientist has not fully considered the mechanics of the theory of embodied cognition (Option A). The author seems engaged in a deeper conceptual analysis, as evidenced by the discussion of philosophical views on the mind, the self, and consciousness. Considering the scrutiny of Descartes’ dualism and emphasis on the connection between the brain, the body, and thought, the author would likely argue for a more integrated approach to cognition that does not entirely exclude abstract concepts.

User Kiritsuku
by
6.5k points