Final answer:
Andrew Jackson's actions as chief legislator, chief executive, and chief in commander included supporting the Indian Removal Act, refusing to enforce a Supreme Court decision in the Indians' favor, and sending troops to slaughter the Indians during the First Seminole War.
Step-by-step explanation:
As the chief legislator, chief executive, and chief in commander, Andrew Jackson made several controversial decisions that many argue he should not have made.
First, as the chief legislator, one notable decision was his support for the Indian Removal Act of 1830, which resulted in the forced relocation of thousands of Indigenous Peoples from their ancestral lands in the Southeast to territories west of the Mississippi River. This decision violated their rights and led to the suffering and loss of life for many Native Americans.
Second, as the chief executive, Jackson's refusal to enforce a Supreme Court decision in the Indians' favor further demonstrated his abuse of power. In Worcester v. Georgia (1832), the Supreme Court ruled that the state of Georgia had no jurisdiction over the Cherokee Nation, but Jackson failed to enforce this decision, allowing Georgia to continue its efforts to forcibly remove the Cherokee.
Lastly, as the chief in commander, Jackson's decision to send troops to slaughter the Indians during the First Seminole War in Florida was highly controversial. His aggressive military actions resulted in the deaths of many Native Americans, further exacerbating the mistreatment they faced.