Question

Health care costs in the United States are on the rise. Some people say that a universal health care system would bring costs down and increase access to care. Others say it would be too expensive and would reduce the quality of care. Complete an internet search for two editorials from both sides of the argument. An editorial is an opinion article written by a professional with an authority on the topic. Editorials can be written by a member of the publication's editorial board or a professional from within the field. Look for reputable websites such as National Public Radio or The New England Journal of Medicine to conduct your research. Then, write a five-paragraph essay in which you compare and contrast each argument in terms of objectivity and the types of evidence presented. Evaluate and explain how the sources use effective evidence to support their claims. Cite the resources you used in your essay to avoid plagiarism.

A) National Public Radio (NPR)
B) The New England Journal of Medicine
C) Other reputable sources
D) No answer is correct

Answer 1

The scope of the health care debate in the U.S. encompasses quality, access, and cost, with varied opinions and evidence presented in editorials. Advocates of universal health care highlight cost and access benefits, while opponents point to the high quality and innovation of the current system. A critical comparison of reputable sources can provide insight into each argument's objectivity and evidence.

Step-by-step explanation:

The debate over the best approach to health care in the United States is ongoing and centers around finding a balance between quality, access, and cost. Editorials from both advocates and critics of universal health care systems provide arguments to support their positions. Proponents argue that universal health care would lead to decreased costs and increased access, while opponents contend it would be costly and potentially decrease the quality of care.

The arguments involving a universal health care system call upon different types of evidence, with advocates often referencing lower overall healthcare costs and better mortality outcomes in other countries, while opponents highlight the innovation and high quality of care present in the private U.S. system. Each side uses evidence that aligns with its perspective to persuade the audience.

A thorough analysis and comparison of editorials from reputable sources such as National Public Radio (NPR) or The New England Journal of Medicine can help illuminate the objectivity of the arguments and the effectiveness of their evidence. It's important to discern between opinionated and neutral sources, as the former are typically used to persuade rather than inform.