Final answer:
Arnold from the fictional narrative wants a logging permit to be granted for a national forest, which he accepts after being offered a bribe. This is understandable given the real-world pressures on politicians, but it is also 'messed up' as it showcases corruption and negligence towards environmental responsibility.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question refers to a situation involving a fictional character Arnold from a narrative that is not specified in the question. However, based on the context provided, Arnold, who seems to be a political figure, is faced with the dilemma of granting a logging permit for a national forest, which he initially acknowledges as problematic since it will be noticeable and potentially controversial. Despite recognizing the issue, Arnold decides to accept a bribe and agrees to the lobbyist's proposal.
This action by Arnold is understandable yet messed up because, on one hand, it shows the realistic pressures and temptations of political office—where making unpopular decisions can be influenced by personal gain. On the other hand, it is 'messed up' because it represents a clear betrayal of public trust and environmental stewardship for personal benefit, highlighting corruption and the prioritization of personal gain over community and environmental health.