227k views
1 vote
Angelina put 3000 mm of water in a tub that already has 5 L of water in it. Jackson says the tub now has 35 L of water in it.

Angelina says he is wrong.
Carry out your steps and explain who is correct and why.

User Cleptus
by
8.0k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

After converting 3000 mm of water to liters, we find that the tub contains a total of 8 liters of water (5 L originally in the tub plus 3 L from the 3000 mm added), not 35 liters as Jackson claimed. Angelina is correct.

Step-by-step explanation:

When addressing the question of whether there are 35 L of water in the tub after adding 3000 mm to 5 L, it is important to first convert 3000 mm to liters. One liter is equivalent to 1000 milliliters. To convert millimeters to liters, we need to be aware that 1 mm of water is 1 mL of water since the density of water is 1 g/mL. Hence, 3000 mm of water is actually 3000 mL of water, which is 3 L (since there are 1000 mL in a liter).

After adding 3 L of water to the existing 5 L, the total amount of water in the tub would be 5 L + 3 L = 8 L. Therefore, Jackson's claim that there are 35 L in the tub is incorrect. The correct total is 8 L of water. Angelina is right in saying that Jackson is wrong about the total volume of water in the tub.

User Vivek
by
8.1k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.