Final answer:
The comparison of memoirs by Ulysses S. Grant and Elizabeth Keckley highlights differing perspectives on the Civil War and the concept of freedom. Grant's accounts of leadership contrast with Keckley's personal narrative of emancipation and life in the Lincoln White House. Understanding the nature of memoirs and biographies aids in grasping the authors' distinct views shaped by their unique experiences and historical contexts.
Step-by-step explanation:
To compare and contrast the narratives of Ulysses S. Grant and Elizabeth Keckley, we must examine the content and the distinct perspectives they offer. Grant's memoir is focused on his experiences as a Union general and president, while Keckley provides an insider's view of life in the White House as a former slave and personal dressmaker to Mary Todd Lincoln. When addressing the theme of freedom, Grant speaks from the position of one who fought to preserve the Union and end slavery, offering a comprehensive take on national liberty and reconstruction. Keckley, meanwhile, shares a more personal account of freedom, reflecting on her journey from slavery to self-sufficiency and her observations of the Lincoln family during the Civil War. Examining other narratives, such as those from the 'Born in Slavery' collection, reveals common themes of hardship, resilience, and the quest for freedom amongst former slaves. The differences often lie in individual experiences and the varying impacts of emancipation on personal lives. For Grant's leadership, some historians critique his presidential administration for corruption and his policies towards Reconstruction; however, others argue that he faced extraordinary challenges during a turbulent period in American history.