Final answer:
In the case of Marbury v. Madison, Chief Justice John Marshall struck a balance between asserting the Supreme Court's authority and respecting the president's authority by ruling in favor of Marbury but also declaring that the part of the Judiciary Act of 1789 granting the Court the power to issue writs of mandamus was unconstitutional. This decision established the principle of judicial review, which strengthened the Court's power to review and possibly nullify the actions of Congress and the president.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the Supreme Court case of Marbury v. Madison, Chief Justice John Marshall struck a balance between asserting the Supreme Court's authority and respecting the president's authority by ruling in favor of Marbury but also declaring that the part of the Judiciary Act of 1789 granting the Court the power to issue writs of mandamus was unconstitutional. This decision established the principle of judicial review, which strengthened the Court's power to review and possibly nullify the actions of Congress and the president.
Judicial review is an important aspect of the federal government's power. It allows the court to interpret and apply the Constitution, ultimately influencing the actions of the other branches of government. By asserting this power, the Court strengthened the federal government by ensuring its adherence to the principles of the Constitution.
Primary topic: Marbury v. Madison and judicial review