Final answer:
The question of how writers consider literary criticism intersects with the concepts of authorial intent and historical context. Reader-response criticism allows readers to interrogate their personal reactions to a text, offering insights into the author's intentions. Literary texts function both as mirrors of their time and as dialogues with the reader, containing political and social implications.
Step-by-step explanation:
Considering whether writers would be mindful of how we or any literary critics might perceive their writing involves an understanding of authorial intent and the impact of culture and time on literary works. Authors often write with specific audiences in mind, and some may be more attuned to the potential analyses their work could undergo. They might also be influenced by the historical moment of their writing or by the desire to address enduring questions and conflicts relevant both in their time and ours.
To address the question of how much a reader can discern about an author's intentions from the text alone, it requires engaging in reader-response criticism: How does the text inspire or challenge them? What existing experiences affect their interpretation of the narrative? These interactions provide insight into the author's message.
Textual analysis does not occur in a vacuum, and considering the political and social ramifications of literary texts is significant. Literature captures the values and biases of its time and offers perspectives that reveal cultural attitudes. This makes understanding literature a dynamic experience that evolves with societal changes and raises questions about how the inclusion or exclusion of certain voices shapes our view of literary heritage and culture.