Final answer:
Solidarity among peoples as stimulated by the UN has been variably put into practice in Europe, the USA, and Japan with regards to immigrants from Latin America and Africa. While programs like DACA in the USA show support for immigrants, instances of hostility and resistance also exist, reflecting a mixed reality. Europe also shows a range of responses from welcome to restriction, and Japan has been historically less open to immigration.
Step-by-step explanation:
Is it possible to affirm that solidarity among peoples, as stimulated by the UN, has been put into practice in Europe, USA, and Japan, in receiving immigrants from Latin America and Africa? This question engages a complex debate about the nature of international solidarity and the actual practice of countries in dealing with immigration. For instance, while the United States has a storied history of immigration, how it embraces immigrants has varied greatly over time. The U.S. has implemented programs like the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) to assist young undocumented immigrants, indicative of a degree of solidarity. However, there are also clear instances of resistance and hostility toward immigrants, reflecting a more conflicted reality.
In Europe, the situation is similarly complex; some countries have welcomed immigrants, seeking to integrate them into society, while others have adopted more restrictive policies, particularly in response to recent waves of migration from the Middle East and Africa. Japan has historically had a more homogeneous society and has been less open to mass immigration, only very recently beginning to explore more open policies due to demographic pressures. Collectively, these regions demonstrate that while the ideal of solidarity is present, its application varies and is often contested in the multiethnic societies of the USA, Europe, and Japan.