Question

Carr borrows two terms from the work of anthropologist Tim Ingold: way-faring and transport. How does he DEFINE each of these terms? What is the key distinction between them, and how is that distinction important to Carr's argument?

a) Way-faring is physical movement, while transport is cognitive navigation; the distinction highlights the mind-body connection.
b) Way-faring is navigation by landmarks, while transport is GPS-guided; the distinction emphasizes technology.
c) Way-faring is land-based travel, while transport is air or sea travel; the distinction relates to modes of transportation.
d) Way-faring is goal-oriented travel, while transport is aimless wandering; the distinction underscores the purpose of movement.

Answer 1

Carr defines way-faring as goal-oriented travel and transport as aimless wandering. The key distinction between the two is the purpose of movement, which is important to Carr's argument about the impact of technology on our way-faring abilities.

Step-by-step explanation:

In his work, Nicholas Carr borrows two terms from anthropologist Tim Ingold: way-faring and transport. Way-faring is defined as goal-oriented travel, while transport is described as aimless wandering. According to Carr, the key distinction between these terms is the purpose of movement. Way-faring involves travel with a specific destination or objective in mind, while transport refers to movement without a clear goal.

This distinction is important to Carr's argument because he explores how our use of technology, particularly the internet and digital devices, has changed our way-faring abilities. He suggests that our constant connectivity and access to information through technology has shifted our focus towards aimless wandering or transport, rather than goal-oriented travel or way-faring. Carr argues that this shift in mindset and behavior can have implications for our cognitive abilities and overall well-being.