Final answer:
The words and phrases from Question 4 most likely support the writer's argument by providing factual evidence in the form of statistics and research findings. This approach strengthens the argument by offering concrete and verifiable data. The effectiveness of this evidence is in line with educational standards that stress the importance of justifying data selection.
Step-by-step explanation:
In analyzing how words and phrases from a text support an argument, one should consider various types of evidence that an author might use. Looking at the provided options, the words and phrases from Question 4 may support her argument by offering one of four distinct functions. Option A) They provide statistical data and research findings, is indicative of an author using hard evidence to back her claims, thereby strengthening her argument with concrete, verifiable information.
Option B) implies that the author is presenting a contrast through a counterargument, which helps her to engage with different viewpoints and demonstrate the validity of her own by addressing and refuting opposing evidence.
Option C) suggests that the words and phrases are off-topic, which would negatively affect the coherence and persuasiveness of the argument, as irrelevant information distracts from the central thesis.
Lastly, Option D) indicates that the author is using emotive language to connect with the reader on a personal level, which can be powerful for persuasion but needs to be carefully balanced with logical reasoning.
Based on strategies for strong argumentation in writing, such as providing quotations, expert opinions, and facts, responding to counterarguments, and using rhetorical devices for emphasis, the most likely option is that the words and phrases from Question 4 provide statistical data and research findings. This aligns with educational standards like 4.1, which require a student to justify the selection of concrete evidence to support their thesis.
Using an anecdotal example in addition to statistics is a strategy to appeal to readers who may not find statistics alone convincing, which supports the argument more holistically.