182k views
0 votes
Determine if it's the law of detachment, syllogism, or invalid.

(1) If a triangle is equilateral, then it is equiangular.
(2) If a triangle is equiangular, then none of its angles are obtuse.
(3) If a triangle is equilateral, then none of its angles are obtuse.
A) Option A: Law of Detachment
B) Option B: Syllogism
C) Option C: Invalid
D) Option D: None of the above

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The statements given lead to a logical conclusion through a common term, thus forming a syllogism, which is a type of deductive reasoning aimed at arriving at a valid conclusion from two related premises.

Step-by-step explanation:

The given statements form a logical sequence that can be identified as a syllogism. A syllogism is a form of deductive reasoning where a conclusion is drawn from two given or assumed propositions (premises), each of which shares a common or middle term not present in the conclusion.

In this case:

  1. If a triangle is equilateral, then it is equiangular.
  2. If a triangle is equiangular, then none of its angles are obtuse.
  3. Therefore, if a triangle is equilateral, then none of its angles are obtuse.

These statements demonstrate that they share a common term ('equiangular'), which leads to a logical conclusion that an equilateral triangle cannot have obtuse angles. This logical progression is a classic example of a syllogism. It is important to discern such logical structures to strengthen deductive reasoning skills and ensure the validity of conclusions in mathematical proofs and arguments.

User Nelaaro
by
8.1k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories