Final answer:
Lincoln's position on slavery evolved from non-interference to active emancipation, reflected in the contrast between his first inaugural address and the Emancipation Proclamation. The two speeches differ substantially in length and structure, with the latter significantly impacting the abolitionist movement. Lincoln's life during this period was dominated by the Civil War's demands and his efforts to reunify the nation.
Step-by-step explanation:
Abraham Lincoln's position on slavery evolved significantly from his first inaugural address to the Emancipation Proclamation. Initially, in his inaugural speech, Lincoln insisted he had no intention to directly interfere with slavery where it existed. His focus was on preventing the expansion of slavery into new territories and maintaining the Union. However, his later Emancipation Proclamation marked a shift towards actively ending slavery as a war measure, declaring freedom for slaves in Confederate states.
The lengths and structures of the two documents are different. The Emancipation Proclamation was a formal, legal document, whereas the Second Inaugural Address was a speech intended for the public, with a more rhetorical and philosophical form.
While the Emancipation Proclamation was initially met with a mix of enthusiasm and skepticism by abolitionists, it eventually galvanized the movement, providing a clear governmental stance against slavery. Lincoln's Second Inaugural Address further solidified the moral imperative of ending slavery, contributing to the eventual passage of the Thirteenth Amendment, which abolished slavery.
During the formulation of these two critical documents, Lincoln experienced great personal and professional challenges, including navigating a divided nation, securing his presidential cabinet, and dealing with the Civil War's extensive political and military strategies.