Question

How might Cody Rudisell’s decision differ if he based it on the utilitarian approach versus individualism approach versus practical approach to ethical decision making? Which approach does he appear to be using?

a) Utilitarian approach prioritizes individual happiness
b) Individualism approach considers the greater good
c) Practical approach focuses on personal interests
d) Cody's approach aligns with utilitarian principles

Answer 1

Cody Rudisell's decision could vary greatly depending on whether he uses a utilitarian, individualism, or practical approach to ethical decision-making. The utilitarian approach suggests that he should consider the greatest good for the greatest number, the individualism approach would focus on his own long-term interests, while the practical approach would rely on common sense and context-specific considerations.

Step-by-step explanation:

Cody Rudisell's ethical decision-making process can be evaluated using different frameworks, such as the utilitarian, individualism, and practical approaches. In the utilitarian approach, the decision should be based on what would produce the greatest good for the greatest number of people. This often involves a careful assessment of the consequences of one's actions on others' happiness and satisfaction. The individualism approach promotes actions that are primarily in the person's own long-term interest and may not necessarily consider the collective good. The practical approach is often guided by common sense and the practicalities of a situation, which can sometimes align with personal interests or be based on conventional morality.

If Cody were to apply the utilitarian approach, his decision would be made in the best interest of the overall happiness and well-being of those affected by his actions. If he considers each situation on its own merits and seeks the greatest happiness outcome in each case, then he leans towards act utilitarianism. However, if he believes in following moral rules that generally promote the greatest happiness, he is closer to rule utilitarianism. The individualism approach would lead him to make choices that primarily benefit his own ambitions and goals, possibly at the expense of others. In contrast, practical decisions are often context-driven and based on prevailing moral norms or practical considerations over theoretical principles.

Based on the information provided, it is not clear which approach Cody is using as that would require further insights into his decision-making patterns and the specific context of his decisions.