Final answer:
Keynesian economics is likely more applicable for addressing current issues of unemployment and negative growth, as it advocates for government intervention to stimulate demand and mitigate economic downturns.
Step-by-step explanation:
If we want to address unemployment and negative growth in our country today, Keynesian economics might be more applicable. This economic theory suggests that during recessions, when the economy experiences high unemployment and negative growth rates, government intervention through fiscal policies such as increased public spending can help stimulate demand and pull the economy out of a downturn. This is in contrast with neoclassical economics, which is more focused on long-term growth and controlling inflation, and assumes that wages and prices adjust to bring the economy back to its potential GDP without the need for government intervention. Keynesian economics views short-term fluctuations as opportunities for government to intervene and mitigate the effects of economic downturns, such as unemployment and recession, by influencing aggregate demand. Given the urgent need to address unemployment and stimulate growth, the Keynesian approach provides a framework for proactive government policies designed to increase economic activity and employment in the short run, thus potentially easing these issues more effectively than waiting for long-term market adjustments.