Final answer:
The logical statements involving propositions P, Q, and R were evaluated, yielding various truth values: P OR R is True, P AND R is False, Q IFF R is False, P IMPLIES Q is True, R IMPLIES NOT Q is True, and NOT Q IMPLIES NOT P is False.
Step-by-step explanation:
A student asked about the truth values of several logical statements relating to three propositions: P (3 is an odd number), Q (23 is a prime number), and R (9 is an even number). Let's evaluate each statement:
- P OR R (P ∨ R): The statement '3 is an odd number OR 9 is an even number.' Since 3 is indeed an odd number, the statement is True.
- P AND R (P ∧ R): The statement '3 is an odd number AND 9 is an even number.' Since 9 is not even, the statement is False.
- Q IFF R (Q ⇔ R): The statement '23 is a prime number IF AND ONLY IF 9 is an even number.' Since 23 is a prime but 9 is not even, the bi-conditional statement is False.
- P IMPLIES Q (P ⇒ Q): The statement 'If 3 is an odd number, then 23 is a prime number.' Both propositions are true, making the implication True.
- R IMPLIES NOT Q (R ⇒ ¬Q): The statement 'If 9 is an even number, then 23 is not a prime number.' This is a True implication because when the antecedent is False, the implication is True despite the truth value of the consequent.
- NOT Q IMPLIES NOT P (¬Q ⇒ ¬P): The statement 'If 23 is not a prime number, then 3 is not an odd number.' This implication is False because Q is true, meaning ~Q is false, and thus, anything that implies from a false statement is True.