Question

Explain the idea of Native Americans with and without treaties.

What are the reasons FOR and AGAINST considering Native Americans to be US citizens?
Explain the controversy around making treaties with Native Americans.
A. Native Americans were always treated fairly in treaty negotiations.
B. The US government had a consistent approach to Native American relations.
C. Some Native American tribes signed treaties, while others did not.
D. All Native Americans were automatically granted US citizenship.

Answer 1

1. Native Americans with treaties had legal agreements with the US government delineating land rights and other provisions, while those without treaties often faced land seizures and forced relocation.

2. Reasons for considering Native Americans as US citizens include promoting equality and granting them full rights; reasons against involve protecting tribal sovereignty and preserving cultural autonomy.

3. Controversy around making treaties with Native Americans stems from varied experiences:

• A. Fair treatment wasn’t consistent;
• B. The US had shifting policies;
• C. Some tribes engaged in treaties, others resisted;
• D. Citizenship wasn’t automatically granted.

Step-by-step explanation:

Treaties with Native Americans were complex and contentious. While some treaties were negotiated fairly, many were marred by deceit, coercion, or unfulfilled promises, undermining trust and perpetuating injustices.

The US government's approach was inconsistent, swinging between recognition of tribal sovereignty and aggressive assimilation efforts. Different tribes had divergent responses, some engaging in treaties to protect their interests, while others fiercely resisted, leading to disparities in their treatment.

Citizenship wasn't uniformly extended, leaving many Native Americans without this status. This history showcases a tumultuous relationship marked by broken agreements and the ongoing struggle for indigenous rights and recognition.