Final answer:
Angelina Grimké would likely view trends in the federal government with scrutiny, especially those that maintained or supported the institution of slavery. She and her sister Sarah were known for using their voices against oppression, both in terms of slavery and gender inequality, and would have favored government trends towards social reform and regulating injustices.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question is about how Angelina Grimké and potentially Catherine Beecher (though not explicitly mentioned in the provided content) would feel about the federal government trend. Angelina Grimké, a well-known abolitionist and woman's rights advocate from the South, along with her sister Sarah, became Quakers and used their position to highlight the oppressive conditions of slavery. Grimké's actions in the abolitionist movement led her to recognize similar oppressive structures against women, and consequently, she also fought for women's rights. During the Grimké sisters' lifetime, the federal government was often influenced by Southern planters, many of whom were slave owners. This control was evident in the number of presidents and Supreme Court justices hailing from slaveholding states. Considering the Grimké sisters' strong abolitionist stance, they would likely view any government trend or policies that supported or permitted slavery negatively. Furthermore, they were part of a movement that looked towards the federal government to regulate injustices like slavery and later, gender equality. Hence, any trend within the federal government to extend its powers towards social reform would align with their philosophy, as seen with some reformists who, by the 1890s, started to see the government's intervention as a necessary aspect of protecting and ensuring freedom.