Final answer:
Without the specific text, we cannot provide exact contrasting images from paragraphs 6 and 7. However, in general, such images can illustrate the divide between present and future, adding urgency to the speaker's message by highlighting the need for change and serving as a persuasive technique to sway the audience's perspective.
Step-by-step explanation:
To annotate the contrasting images in paragraphs 6 and 7, one would need to examine the text for sentences that depict highly contrasting or opposing ideas or images. Unfortunately, without the specific text available, we cannot provide the exact contrasting images. However, once identified, these images can suggest a lot about the speaker's view of the present and the future. Contrasts often highlight dilemmas or tensions that the speaker feels, illustrating a divide between the current state of affairs and potential future outcomes.
These opposing images can add urgency to the speaker's message by showing the stark differences between what is and what could be, urging the audience to take action or to reconsider their current standpoint. The use of vivid contrasts grabs the attention of the reader or listener and emphasizes the importance or immediacy of the issue at hand.
The speaker's message, influenced by the presentation of these contrasting images, likely revolves around a call to action, a critique of the present, or a hopeful or warning vision of the future. Such juxtapositions can serve as a persuasive technique to drive the point home more powerfully.
For instance, contrasting the darkness of a polluted city with the brightness of a clean, renewable energy future not only paints a picture of the present but also implies a choice that must be made. By enhancing the emotional impact of the message, these changes from mere description to persuasive writing help to sway the audience's perspective.