Final answer:
Violating the Code of Conduct by giving harmful information to enemies would result from a conflict between two duties: honesty and non-harm. Ethical dilemmas like these require careful consideration of the consequences and the greater good.
Step-by-step explanation:
If you gave information harmful to your fellow prisoners, you would likely be violating the article of the Code of Conduct related to aiding the enemy. In essence, this would be a conflict between the duty to not disclose information that could harm fellow prisoners and the duty to provide information when questioned by the enemy. This kind of scenario highlights the ethical dilemma one could face when dealing with two conflicting duties: to never tell a lie and to avoid harming someone.
Resolving such a conflict could depend on the situational ethics and the specific circumstances involved. Weighing the consequences of telling the truth versus the potential harm that could result is a delicate balance. In some ethical frameworks, prioritizing the lesser harm or choosing the action that leads to the greater good is a way to resolve such dilemmas.
Based on the scenario, the article of the Code of Conduct that you would violate if you gave information harmful to your fellow prisoners is Article 44. This article discusses potential violations of the rule requiring informed consent in research studies.
By giving harmful information about your fellow prisoners, you would be violating the principle of informed consent, which requires participants to be fully aware of the potential risks and benefits of the study before giving their consent to participate.
Telling harmful information without the consent of your fellow prisoners would go against the ethical guidelines outlined in the Code of Conduct.