Final answer:
A thorough understanding of the Philippine Constitution among Filipinos is paramount for effective citizenship but may not be uniformly present. Knowledge can be enhanced through educational initiatives and civic engagement. The constitution can undergo formal and informal amendments, reflecting its nature as a living document that must be interpreted in the context of contemporary issues.
Step-by-step explanation:
As Filipinos, having the right knowledge and understanding of our own constitution is crucial for informed citizenship and effective participation in governance. Unfortunately, not all citizens may have a thorough understanding of the constitution's content and principles. The guiding principles of our constitution, similar to those of the United States, include the separation of powers, the rule of law, and the protection of fundamental rights and freedoms.
Improving knowledge of the constitution can be achieved through education and active engagement with the text. The Philippine Constitution can be formally amended through methods established by the constitution itself, such as a constitutional convention, a constituent assembly, or a people's initiative. Meanwhile, informal amendments occur through judicial interpretations, cultural and societal shifts, and changes in governmental practices, which can lead to a shift in how constitutional provisions are applied and understood, reflecting the idea that the constitution is a "living document."
Whether the constitution should be amended to protect national symbols or afford citizens more direct legislative power involves a deeper consideration of the balance between national unity, respect for symbols, civil liberties, and democratic processes. These are complex questions that require debate, critical thinking, and a sound knowledge of the constitution and its operation within the country's legal and political framework.
Originalist views of constitutional interpretation adhere strictly to the intentions of the founding framers, whereas activist interpretations allow for a broader, more modern application of constitutional principles. Understanding these different perspectives aids in the comprehension of the constitution and current legal debates, including those surrounding the right to privacy.