Final Answer:
Mohan and Uma differ in their approaches to handling elephants. Mohan employs a more traditional, authoritative method, emphasizing dominance and control. In contrast, Uma adopts a more empathetic and collaborative approach, seeking to establish a bond based on understanding and trust.
Step-by-step explanation:
Mohan's approach to dealing with elephants is rooted in a traditional, hierarchical model where he asserts dominance and control over the animals. This can be observed in his use of tools like hooks and chains to manage the elephants, relying on a power dynamic to establish authority.
Such methods may yield short-term compliance but risk creating a fear-based relationship, potentially leading to negative consequences in the long run. The focus is on subduing the elephants rather than fostering a mutual understanding.
On the other hand, Uma takes a more modern and empathetic approach. She recognizes the intelligence and emotional complexity of elephants and seeks to build a relationship based on trust and communication. Uma employs positive reinforcement techniques, using rewards and encouragement to guide the elephants.
This approach aims to create a partnership where both the human and elephant work together, fostering a sense of cooperation. By understanding the elephants' needs and emotions, Uma strives to create a harmonious environment that benefits both parties.
In summary, while Mohan relies on a traditional, dominance-based method, Uma embraces a more contemporary and compassionate approach that prioritizes cooperation and mutual respect.
The key difference lies in their fundamental philosophies about human-animal interactions, with Mohan emphasizing control and Uma valuing understanding and collaboration.