Final answer:
The grand jury decided not to indict Police Officer Jake Summers, indicating they did not find ample evidence to charge him with a crime related to Mike Chang's death. Their decision means there will be no trial to determine Summers' guilt or innocence based on the death in question. Understanding a grand jury's role and decisions is crucial in grasping this aspect of the criminal justice system.
Step-by-step explanation:
A grand jury has decided not to indict Police Officer Jake Summers in the death of Mike Chang. This is a legal decision indicating that after considering the evidence presented, the grand jury did not find sufficient basis to charge Officer Summers with a crime related to this incident. Understanding the grand jury's decision requires knowing the specific counts and evidence.
In the example provided, a grand jury found the defendant not guilty on certain counts and guilty on others in a different case. A grand jury's role is to review evidence presented by the prosecution to determine whether there is probable cause to believe that a crime was committed and that the accused committed that crime. If they decide there isn't enough evidence, they will not issue an indictment, which means the accused will not be charged with the crime in question. Their decision is an integral part of the criminal justice process, often happening in private and based on legal standards and the evidence presented.
It is important to note that the grand jury does not determine guilt or innocence; rather, it determines whether enough evidence exists to bring the case to trial. In the case mentioned, if Officer Summers was not indicted, it means the grand jury concluded the evidence was insufficient to proceed with a criminal trial against him in relation to Mike Chang's death.