Final answer:
The statement that site marking is not required for implant removal surgeries like those for a Mediport or pacemaker is false. Surgical site marking is a universal patient safety protocol to prevent wrong-site surgeries.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'Site marking is not required for procedures in which implants, such as a Mediport or pacemaker, are planned for removal' is false. Site marking is a critical component of the pre-operative process and is intended to prevent wrong-site surgery, which is a recognized patient safety goal. Although there might be specific protocols and exceptions depending on the facility and the type of procedure, in general, current best practices dictate that the surgical site should be marked, especially when there is more than one possible location for surgery. This is in line with the guidelines from organizations like the Joint Commission and the World Health Organization that advocate for site marking as part of the Universal Protocol for all surgical and invasive procedures, to ensure the correct site, procedure, and patient.