Final answer:
Without additional context about Sanya's interpretation of the point (1, 3/4), we cannot accurately determine whether she is correct. The point represents a location on the graph, but its significance depends on the graph's specific details and what Sanya claims about it.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question posed cannot be accurately answered without additional context regarding Sanya's interpretation of the point (1, 3/4) on the graph. In mathematics, a point on a graph is generally described by its coordinates, which in this case are (1, 3/4). Here, the first number (1) represents the position on the x-axis (horizontal axis), while the second number (3/4) refers to the position on the y-axis (vertical axis). If Sanya's interpretation of the point (1, 3/4) involves recognizing that the point is located one unit right of the y-axis and three-quarters of a unit above the x-axis, then her interpretation is indeed correct.
If we're dealing with a standard Cartesian coordinate system, we might expect that Sanya is analyzing the graph in a linear function, quadratic function, or other types of functions. It's critical to evaluate whether her interpretation fits the context of the graph she's analyzing. For instance, if Sanya says that the point is the intersection of two lines, a vertex of a polygon, or represents a specific data point in a scatter plot, then the correctness of her interpretation will depend on the specific details of the graph.
Without knowing the specific details of Sanya's interpretation, we can't confirm whether she is correct or not. To give a definitive answer, it would be necessary to know more about what Sanya is saying about the point on the graph and how it relates to the rest of the information presented within that graph.