Final answer:
If no duty is owed by the defendant to the plaintiff in a civil case, the defendant is typically not penalized, even if the plaintiff suffered damages, as establishing a duty is crucial to holding someone liable. Option 2 is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
If the defendant in a civil procedure owed no duty to the plaintiff, then the defendant is typically not penalized, even if the plaintiff suffered damages. This is because one of the essential elements of a civil lawsuit is the establishment of a duty owed by the defendant to the plaintiff.
Without such a duty, there is usually no legal basis for holding the defendant liable for the plaintiff's damages. It is important to understand that civil law operates on the premise that a duty must exist in order for there to be infringement and consequent liability. Should a case proceed to court, the plaintiff must demonstrate, among other things, that the defendant owed a duty that was breached.
In summary, the answer to the original question is that if no duty is owed by the defendant to the plaintiff, then typically, the defendant is not penalized, and the correct answer is False.