Final answer:
To charge someone with receiving stolen property, the prosecution must prove possession, knowledge, intent, and control of the stolen item. The scenario described lacks direct evidence but suggests potential possession and knowledge. The variance in property crime rates may influence perceptions and enforcement of the law.All the Options are correct answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
To charge someone with the crime of receiving stolen property, four elements must generally be proven: possession, knowledge, intent, and control. Possession refers to the physical custody or ability to exercise dominion over the property. Knowledge means that the individual knew or reasonably should have known the property was stolen. Intent involves establishing that the individual intended to deprive the rightful owner of the possession of the property. Control implies that the person had power over the property and the capacity to determine its use.
In relation to the provided scenario, if the police can gather evidence showing that the suspects had control and possession of the stolen items from the armed robbery, and they knew the items were stolen, then they might be charged with receiving stolen property, in addition to unlawfully carrying a weapon. For instance, if it's found that they are holding items taken during the armed robbery and are aware of their illicit origin, those are significant steps towards proving the charge.
Also, the rate of property crime being higher in certain regions like California or Washington compared to New York or Wisconsin can play a role in how law enforcement and the public perceive the likelihood of such crimes occurring, and may possibly affect how rigorously certain laws are enforced or how resources are allocated to prevent such crimes.