Final answer:
To build a case for a seizure, evidence of distribution and narcotics are important. The Virginia Employment Commission is not relevant to this scenario. The reasonableness of the search and seizure is a common point of discussion in such litigation.
Step-by-step explanation:
When building a case for a seizure, the following elements are important: the presence of items indicative of distribution and narcotics. These elements would be relevant to justify the seizure under laws pertaining to the control of illegal substances. The Virginia Employment Commission, on the other hand, is not related to this context. Therefore, in regards to the question of which elements are important to building a case for a seizure, the options that apply are the presence of items indicative of distribution and narcotics. In the broader context of search and seizure litigation, a significant issue is the degree to which the search and seizure is reasonable, which often revolves around constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.
The presence of items indicative of the distribution, narcotics, and the Virginia Employment Commission are all important factors to consider when building a case for a seizure. In cases of search and seizure, litigation often revolves around the reasonableness of the search and seizure, privacy rights, and the right to legal counsel. These factors play a crucial role in determining the validity and legality of a seizure.