Final answer:
Code 15.2-1719 does not apply to firearms and bicycles.
The information provided about Code 15.2-1719 seems to relate to regulations surrounding firearms.
Step-by-step explanation:
Code 15.2-1719 does not apply to both firearms and bicycles. It is important to note that this code is not a universal law that applies everywhere, but rather specific to the jurisdiction where it is enacted. In this case, without more context, it is difficult to determine the specific provisions of Code 15.2-1719. The accuracy of the statement about Code 15.2-1719 applying to firearms and bicycles cannot be confirmed without the complete text of the code. Landmark cases like District of Columbia v. Heller and United States v. Miller focus on firearms regulations without connections to bicycles. For precise information, one should consult the legal text of Code 15.2-1719.
The information provided about Code 15.2-1719 seems to relate to regulations surrounding firearms. However, without the full context or jurisdiction, it is hard to verify if the code specifically applies to firearms and bicycles. Typically, firearm regulation codes, such as those mentioned in landmark cases like District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and United States v. Miller, do not pertain to bicycles. In District of Columbia v. Heller, provisions of the D.C. Code restricted the registration and carrying of unregistered firearms, and stated that police could issue licenses for handguns. In United States v. Miller, the ruling was that the government can limit weapons that don’t have a relationship to a well-regulated militia. These cases focus on firearms and the Second Amendment, without mention of bicycles. Without the full text of Code 15.2-1719, we cannot definitively state whether the code applies to both firearms and bicycles, and as such, we cannot confirm the accuracy of that statement. It is recommended to refer to the specific governmental or legal resource for the accurate text of Code 15.2-1719.