Final answer:
True, civil forfeiture does not require criminal charges to be pressed for law enforcement to seize assets suspected to be related to criminal activity. The process is aimed to be addressed by legislative actions such as the Fifth Amendment Integrity Restoration Act due to its controversial nature and impact.
Step-by-step explanation:
Corresponding criminal charges are not required for forfeiture is a statement related to the practice of civil forfeiture. This legal procedure allows law enforcement agencies to seize property and assets that they suspect are connected to criminal activity, even before a person is formally charged or convicted. The process is controversial because it can occur without the same level of proof required for criminal conviction. The statement is true: civil forfeiture does not necessarily require corresponding criminal charges. It can lead to significant financial incentive for agencies to pursue drug crimes, as noted by Tiegen (2018). Furthermore, the Fifth Amendment Integrity Restoration Act is a legislative movement aimed at curtailing the practice of policing for profit through civil forfeiture, particularly given its past role in the war on drugs and the negative impact on communities and individuals who have not been charged or convicted.
The principle that 'excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted' touches upon different aspects of the law but does not directly relate to the requirements for civil forfeiture.