Final answer:
The Fifth Amendment protects individuals from self-incrimination, and under Miranda v. Arizona, police must notify suspects of their rights before interrogation.
Step-by-step explanation:
If the officer has not said or done anything that would cause the individual to believe they are in custody or under arrest, it does not matter that the officer has abundant probable cause and intends to arrest the individual at the conclusion of the interview.
According to the Fifth Amendment, the police practice of interrogating individuals without notifying them of their right to counsel and their protection against self-incrimination can, indeed, violate their constitutional rights. This was established in the landmark Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona, which highlighted the importance of ensuring that suspects are adequately informed of their rights before and during questioning.
The Miranda rights, derived from this case, ensure that suspects are told they have the right to remain silent, that anything they say can be used against them in a court of law, that they have the right to consult an attorney before speaking to the police and to have an attorney present during questioning, and if they cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for them.
However, it is noted that despite these rights being read, many suspects still waive their Miranda rights and provide incriminating evidence against themselves, which is a testament to the complex dynamics of police interrogations.