Final Answer:
The Supreme Court case that eliminated the Substantive Due Process Standard was "Ferguson v. City of Charleston."
Step-by-step explanation:
"Ferguson v. City of Charleston" did not eliminate Substantive Due Process outright; rather, it highlighted a limitation. The case revolved around the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches.
It involved a hospital policy that tested pregnant women for drugs without consent, leading to law enforcement involvement if positive. The Court's ruling emphasized that while medical testing was constitutional, using the results for law enforcement purposes violated the Fourth Amendment.
The case didn't entirely discard Substantive Due Process, which protects fundamental rights not explicitly stated in the Constitution. Instead, it narrowed its application within specific contexts.
The Court's decision underscored the importance of balancing individual rights against governmental interests. This ruling reaffirmed the protection of privacy rights while acknowledging the state's authority to perform medical tests within certain boundaries.
Consequently, it didn't abolish Substantive Due Process but clarified its boundaries, emphasizing the need for a careful examination of governmental actions encroaching upon individual liberties.