Final answer:
Refusing to show a property to someone due to their sexual orientation would violate legislation related to LGBTQ rights and discrimination.
Step-by-step explanation:
Refusing to show a property to a person based on their sexual orientation would violate legislation related to LGBTQ rights and discrimination. In the United States, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia in 2020 that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects LGBTQ employees against discrimination, including discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. Therefore, it would be considered illegal to discriminate against someone based on their sexual orientation in this context.
Refusing to show a property to a person due to their sexual orientation would violate equal housing laws and anti-discrimination statutes, particularly in light of the Supreme Court ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County. If a Minnesota licensee refuses to show a property to a person because that person is homosexual, they would be violating equal housing laws and potential anti-discrimination statutes. Since the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County, it has been established that the prohibition against discrimination based on sex, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, also extends to discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. This ruling is indicative of a broader interpretation of anti-discrimination laws that likely extends to housing discrimination. Additionally, the Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination in housing-related activities on the basis of sex, which by the current legal standards includes sexual orientation and gender identity.