Final answer:
Walter McMillian was aggressively prosecuted by the state, influenced by the use of plea bargains, a prosecutorial focus on securing convictions, and the impact of jury compositions on trial results. The state ultimately dropped the charges against him. so, option a is the correct answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
The state ruled the charges against Walter McMillian by choosing to prosecute him. McMillian's case is an example of the complexities and potential injustices within the legal system, where defendants often face plea bargains, prosecutorial determination to secure convictions, and the influence of jury compositions on trial outcomes. McMillian's situation was grim, with a strong stance to prosecute despite the challenges and eventual dropping of charges related to him.
In the case of Walter McMillian, the state ruled their charges by prosecuting him on Murder in the First Degree charges. This means that the state accused him of committing a deliberate and premeditated murder, which is a serious criminal offense. It indicates that the state believed they had sufficient evidence to prove McMillian's guilt in court.