Final answer:
Mobile recording of police brutality can be categorized as sousveillance, which refers to individuals or groups using personal recording devices to monitor and document activities of authority figures.
Step-by-step explanation:
Mobile recording of police brutality can be categorized as sousveillance. Sousveillance refers to the act of individuals or groups using personal recording devices, such as smartphones, to monitor and document activities of authority figures, particularly in cases where abuse of power or human rights violations may occur. It is a form of citizen surveillance from below, as opposed to top-down surveillance by authorities. The widespread use of mobile recording has contributed to the increased awareness and public discussion around police practices and use of force.
Mobile recording of police brutality can be identified as both sousveillance and mobile witnessing since they involve the use of personal technology to document events and can contribute to social discourse.
The mobile recording of police brutality can be categorized as both sousveillance and mobile witnessing. Sousveillance refers to the recording of an activity by a participant in the activity, typically by way of small wearable or portable personal technologies. Mobile witnessing, on the other hand, involves the use of mobile technology to capture and share events in real-time, often to draw public attention or start social discussion about the event. Both terms are applicable in the context of citizens recording acts of police brutality, as individuals utilize personal technology to document and share footage of such events, often contributing to the public discourse on policing practices and calling for accountability.