140k views
5 votes
To what degree is protection implicitly implied? If a man does everything in his power to avoid a pregnancy (barring abstinence or a vasectomy) and can prove his intent and the woman still becomes pregnant, even by fraud, the man is still liable for that pregnancy. Women are 100% protected and men are 0% protected.

User FloChanz
by
7.7k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

Protection and liability in relation to pregnancy

Step-by-step explanation:

The subject of this question is Health. The question addresses the issue of protection in relation to pregnancy, specifically the implied protection for men and women. It mentions that if a man does everything in his power to avoid pregnancy, but the woman still becomes pregnant, the man is still liable. The question asserts that women are 100% protected while men are 0% protected.

It is important to recognize that protection against pregnancy involves the responsibility of both partners. While contraceptive methods can help prevent pregnancy, there is no method that is 100% effective besides abstinence. Each individual has a choice in selecting a contraceptive method that aligns with their goals and preferences.

In cases where pregnancy occurs despite the use of contraception or due to fraudulent actions, the legal and financial implications can be complex. The interpretation of liability may vary depending on the specific circumstances and the jurisdiction involved.

User AnnaSchumann
by
7.8k points