Final answer:
A credible witness knowing the signer and notary suggests a level of trust but does not automatically validate a document. Factors influencing validity include legal requirements and the integrity of the witness's testimony. Truth and expert consensus are critical in assessing credibility and document validity. so, option 1 is the correct answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
If a credible witness personally knows the signer and the notary, it implies that there is a level of trust and recognition in the identities of the parties involved in the notarization process. However, this alone does not guarantee the validity of the document. Document validity can be influenced by various factors beyond witness credibility, such as the adherence to the legal requirements for the document and the proper execution of the notarial act itself. Legal requirements might include the presence of necessary signatures, correct dates, and any required official stamps or seals.
Furthermore, the integrity of the witness testimony can be scrutinized based on certain considerations: Is the witness an expert in the field related to the document? Does their testimony align with the consensus among experts? And is there any reason to suspect bias in the testimony provided? Claims of knowing something must be substantiated by truth, as a statement is either true or not, without degrees. The intended audience, possible omissions of relevant points, the persuasiveness of evidence upon first reading, and the logic and credibility behind the position may also affect how the testimony and, by extension, the document's validity is perceived.