176k views
2 votes
When out of bounds is defined by a line on the ground, is the line itself out of bounds?

1) True
2) False

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

The line defining out of bounds in sports is considered in bounds; thus, the statement is false. Additionally, in terms of displacement, it is false that one person's displacement would be more than the other's if both start and end at the same points, regardless of the path taken.

Step-by-step explanation:

Understanding Out of Bounds in Sports

When a line on the ground is used to define an out-of-bounds area in sports, the common rule is that the line itself is considered in bounds. Therefore, the statement that the line itself is out of bounds is false. A ball or player in contact with the line is still considered to be within the boundaries of play. For a player or object to be out of bounds, it must be entirely outside the line, not touching it.

Concept of Displacement

The statement suggesting that the displacement of a person walking 2 blocks east and 5 blocks north is more than another person walking 5 blocks north and then 2 blocks east is false. Both individuals will have the same displacement, as displacement is a vector quantity that depends only on the initial and final positions, not on the path taken. Since both start and end their journey at the same points, their displacements are equal.

User Rik Renich
by
7.0k points