Final answer:
The question relates to the time frame LARA has to make a decision after receiving a hearing report, an example of procedural rules in administrative law.
Step-by-step explanation:
The subject of the question pertains to administrative law, specifically the process and time frame within which the Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA) must make a final decision after receiving a hearing report with respect to penalties.
While the exact number of days LARA has to make this decision is not provided in the context of the question, it is an example of procedural rules that administrative bodies must follow. In a general context relating to law and administrative procedures, such time frames are usually stipulated by the relevant legal statutes or regulations.
The scenario described in the question is reminiscent of issues addressed in the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009. Although the Act pertains to employment discrimination and not administrative procedures, it highlights the importance of time frames in the legal process, especially concerning discrimination. In Ledbetter's case, the statute of limitations for filing a discrimination suit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act was central.
The Supreme Court's interpretation led to the establishment of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which broadened the definition of discriminatory practice to consider each discriminatory paycheck as a new instance of discrimination, effectively resetting the clock for the statute of limitations each time.