Final answer:
The role of the state attorney general in opening correspondence files is not explicitly covered in the information provided. Instead, the focus is on the solicitor general's duties related to the government's position in a case, suggesting that the initial statement is false. Federal courts are more likely to hear a state case that involves a federal question.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that the state attorney general opens a correspondence file for each case after a complaint is filed does not align with the provided information about the role of the solicitor general, who determines the government's stance on a case, prepares, and files petitions and briefs, as well as presents oral arguments before the Court. Therefore, the statement is False. A state case is more likely to be heard by the federal courts primarily when it involves a federal question. The involvement of a federal question means that the case has issues concerning the Constitution, federal law, or treaties that require a federal court's interpretation.
Requests by a governor for a federal hearing, involvement in criminal matters, or indecision within state courts do not automatically qualify a state case for moving to the federal court system. It is essential to note that the legal system is structured with specific jurisdictional and procedural rules that determine which court will hear a particular case.