Final answer:
The statement is false as constitutional law underpins recruitment and selection practices at all times, not only when challenged legally. Discrimination is subject to strict scrutiny, and the Bill of Rights influences state laws even before issues reach the courts.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that constitutional law becomes an issue only when recruitment or selection practices are challenged in a human rights tribunal or court is false. Constitutional law principles, such as due process and anti-discrimination measures, are inherent in recruitment and selection practices. They are not only relevant when practices are challenged in tribunals or courts, but also play a significant role in shaping and guiding these practices to prevent discrimination and ensure fairness.
Discrimination is taken very seriously under constitutional law, with the courts applying the strict scrutiny standard to cases involving discrimination based on race, ethnicity, religion, or national origin. Additionally, the Bill of Rights is applied to state laws through the courts, ensuring that federal constitutional standards are upheld at all levels.
Moreover, even before challenges arise, constitutional principles are integral to establishing the legality and fairness of practices in both the public and private domains. Practices in hiring and selection must adhere to constitutional norms proactively, rather than only being scrutinized retroactively in legal disputes.