Final answer:
In a typical pet care contract, responsibility for the maintenance and care of pets is usually assigned to the pet sitter. However, in certain cultures, animals are not owned but rather engage in a reciprocal relationship with people, which differs from traditional pet ownership models.
Step-by-step explanation:
In a contract concerning the care and maintenance of the owner's pet(s), it is generally wise to stipulate that the pet sitter is responsible during the time they are engaged to look after the pets. This ensures that there is a clear understanding of who should provide necessary care such as feeding, grooming, and veterinary needs while the owner is away. However, this question also alludes to cultural differences in the relationship between humans and animals.
In certain cultures, animals like dogs are not seen as property but rather as autonomous beings that engage in a mutual relationship with people. These dogs live freely, choosing where to go and providing companionship and service without being owned. This cultural practice highlights the importance of mutual respect and reciprocity, contrasting with the legal definition of pet ownership where responsibility is typically more clearly defined.