Question

This subject is Global Perspectives it is not in the subject selections so I picked something random

Earn 15 points by answering this


Source 3: The world's energy problems must be solved by the rich industrialised countries
Cheap, reliable and sustainable energy is needed by all nations to solve the world's energy problems.
But who should pay for this?
The rich industrialised nations have created the problem. History shows us that industrialisation in the
past depended upon dirty fossil fuels for power. Rich industrialised nations emit the most greenhouse
gases. In 2020, a study by Oxfam showed that the richest 10 per cent of the global population were
responsible for about 52 per cent of global emissions. If they caused the problem, it is right for them to
solve the problem.
Richer, industrialised nations have renewable technology using the sun and wind to produce cheaper.
sustainable energy. This technology should be shared with other nations.
Developing nations do not yet have enough money and expertise to end energy poverty We must
help them we are all suffering from climate change and should work together to provide clean
energy for all
Extract from an internet blog on energy written in the United States in 2021



2 Study Source 3.
(a) The world's energy problems must be solved by the rich industrialised countries.
What are the strengths and weaknesses of the argument supporting this claim?

Answer 1

The argument that wealthy industrialised countries should address global energy issues is supported by their historical emissions and resources, yet it is weakened by issues of fairness, the increasing emissions from developing countries, and the need for global cooperation.

Step-by-step explanation:

The argument that rich industrialised countries should solve the world's energy problems has several strengths. One of the main strengths is the moral responsibility these countries have due to their historical contribution to greenhouse gas emissions, making them primary contributors to climate change. This is supported by evidence such as the 2020 Oxfam study showing that the richest 10 per cent of the global population were responsible for about 52 per cent of global emissions. Furthermore, these nations have the financial and technological resources to develop sustainable energy solutions.

However, there are also weaknesses in this argument. One significant weakness is the assumption that high-income countries should primarily bear the responsibility for climate change mitigation, which does not account for rapidly increasing emissions from industrializing nations. In addition, there is a fairness issue in asking low-income countries to prioritize environmental protection over economic development, particularly when their citizens are in dire need of improved living conditions. Lastly, imposing the burden exclusively on wealthy countries may ignore the necessity of global cooperation and the potential for innovative solutions from all nations.